Reflection 2

       Eventually, my project has gradually reached the destination. The final meeting is definitely the milestone on my way to discussing the issue of privacy on Facebook. However, beside the joy of triumph, I still have to face some flaws in my paper.

     First of all, the display to demonstrate the structure needs revision. The current way may have audience lost. The relation between all the points are complicated: Sometimes they are connected, while sometimes contradictory. Not to mention examples, they can be somehow more diffused than thesis themselves.     Without a clear, simple structure, such presentation tend to confuse audience. To fix the problem right, tables are a good solution. According to scientific proof, people embrace image more easily than pure words. Namely, image is the much better way to introduce innovative, bold thesis than purely using dull, stiff words. To build not only well- design but also formulated tables is my further work to the final presentation.

      Besides, I also discover falsery in my annotation 3. I should take individuality into my consideration: Everyone is unique. We have our free well. A generalized and unify privacy norm is impossible for the real world. We all have our taboos accompanied by stories we love to share. Consequently, a paper discussing privacy issues on Facebook without the consideration of individualism can be dangerous. It can't fully explain some facts existing on the SNS. Without a doubt, individualism is one of the dominant atom in SNS industry. For finding out such important mistake, I would like to attribute the effort to my partner, Alice. It is her view from the opposite side toward Facebook that save my paper.

       For the final presentation, I'm both jitter and excited: Until now it is my biggest challenge in my school works. I am determined I will try to make it perfect!